ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Clopidogrel-induced drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome following percutaneous coronary intervention: a case report of therapeutic dilemma and management strategy.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction. Clopidogrel induced DHS following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) presents a unique therapeutic challenge due to the critical need for dual antiplatelet therapy to prevent stent thrombosis. Case summary: A 70-year-old male underwent emergency PCI with multiple stent implantation for unstable angina with three-vessel coronary disease. Standard dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 100 mg daily and clopidogrel 75 mg daily) was initiated post-procedure. One hour after PCI, the patient developed anaphylactic shock initially attributed to contrast agent allergy. Two weeks post-discharge, he presented with recurrent skin rash, hypotension, gastrointestinal bleeding, fever, and eosinophilia, consistent with DIHS. Multidisciplinary consultation confirmed clopidogrel-induced DIHS using established diagnostic criteria. Despite the high risk of stent thrombosis, dual antiplatelet therapy was discontinued due to life-threatening complications. The patient was successfully managed with indobufen and low dose corticosteroids, resulting in complete symptom resolution. Conclusion: This case highlights the diagnostic complexity of clopidogrel-induced DIHS and presents the detailed account of successful management of it. Early recognition using standardized diagnostic criteria and multidisciplinary management are crucial for patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.