ArticleClinical epidemiology2026
Validity of Amyloidosis in the Danish National Patient Registry.
Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the validity of diagnosis code algorithms for identifying amyloidosis and its most common subtypes in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Design and Setting: Validation study of routine amyloidosis registrations in the DNPR. As the reference standard, we used medical record review of discharge summaries and diagnostic examinations. Study Population: We included all patients identified through an algorithm with a first-time primary or secondary, inpatient or outpatient amyloidosis diagnosis at Aarhus University Hospital between December 1, 2018, and November 30, 2023. Subtype classification was performed using predefined algorithms to identify wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt), amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, and variant ATTR (ATTRv). Main Outcome: We calculated positive predictive values (PPVs) as the number of patients with a confirmed diagnosis divided by the total number of registered diagnoses in the DNPR. Subgroup analyses were performed for ATTRwt. Results: Among 334 patients registered with a first-time amyloidosis diagnosis, 313 had their diagnosis confirmed, corresponding to an overall PPV of 94% (95% CI: 91-96). The PPVs for the individual subtypes were 85% (95% CI: 80-90) for ATTRwt, 90% (95% CI: 79-96) for AL amyloidosis, and 57% (95% CI: 33-79) for ATTRv. For ATTRwt, the PPV increased to 94% (95% CI: 90-97) among patients aged ≥60 years registered in cardiology department. Conclusion: Routine amyloidosis registration in the DNPR demonstrated high validity overall and for the ATTRwt and AL amyloidosis subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.