Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41744003›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2026

Validity of Amyloidosis in the Danish National Patient Registry.

Jens Kaestel Skov, Usama Sikandar, Kasper Bonnesen, Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen, Morten Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jens Kaestel SkovDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9048-690X
Usama SikandarDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0982-5618
Kasper BonnesenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
Steen Hvitfeldt PoulsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
Morten SchmidtDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4935-4059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the validity of diagnosis code algorithms for identifying amyloidosis and its most common subtypes in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Design and Setting: Validation study of routine amyloidosis registrations in the DNPR. As the reference standard, we used medical record review of discharge summaries and diagnostic examinations. Study Population: We included all patients identified through an algorithm with a first-time primary or secondary, inpatient or outpatient amyloidosis diagnosis at Aarhus University Hospital between December 1, 2018, and November 30, 2023. Subtype classification was performed using predefined algorithms to identify wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt), amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, and variant ATTR (ATTRv). Main Outcome: We calculated positive predictive values (PPVs) as the number of patients with a confirmed diagnosis divided by the total number of registered diagnoses in the DNPR. Subgroup analyses were performed for ATTRwt. Results: Among 334 patients registered with a first-time amyloidosis diagnosis, 313 had their diagnosis confirmed, corresponding to an overall PPV of 94% (95% CI: 91-96). The PPVs for the individual subtypes were 85% (95% CI: 80-90) for ATTRwt, 90% (95% CI: 79-96) for AL amyloidosis, and 57% (95% CI: 33-79) for ATTRv. For ATTRwt, the PPV increased to 94% (95% CI: 90-97) among patients aged ≥60 years registered in cardiology department. Conclusion: Routine amyloidosis registration in the DNPR demonstrated high validity overall and for the ATTRwt and AL amyloidosis subtypes.

Indexed as

amyloidosispopulation-based researchtransthyretinvalidation

Identifiers

PMID41744003
PMCPMC12929212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.