ReviewRSC advances2026
Exploring the advances in 2D materials as a quest for energy storage electrode materials.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Materials in Spain.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Comparison Between Ultrasonic and Thermal Exfoliation for Molybdenum Disulfide Nanoparticles-A Multifunctional Study.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing demand for effective energy storage solutions has spurred research into innovative materials with exceptional properties. Among these, two-dimensional (2D) materials have become popular alternatives due to their unique mechanical, chemical, and electrical characteristics. This review highlights recent advances in using 2D materials-such as graphene, MXenes, and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) for energy storage devices like batteries and supercapacitors. Graphene, known for its high conductivity and surface area, enhances charge storage when used as an anode. MXenes, a newer class with variable compositions, provide high capacitance for both anodes and cathodes. The large surface area and capacitance of graphene, along with the flexibility of MXenes, offer promising advantages. Additionally, combining 2D materials with carbon nanotubes and metal nanoparticles further improves storage performance. New hybrid architectures and composites that incorporate 2D materials optimise energy storage devices, increasing metrics such as energy density and cycling stability. Moreover, integrating 2D materials into flexible, wearable devices addresses the needs of portable electronics and IoT. The review links the structure, synthesis, and characterisation to the electrochemical behavior of each material and also captures recent advances in the last decade related to battery and supercapacitor applications. In addition, the review includes two tables that compare the performance of each type of material as well as an increased focus on emerging hybrid structures for next-generation energy storage systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.