ArticleFrontiers in neuroergonomics2026
Hybrid EEG-fNIRS phoneme classification based on imagined and perceived speech.
Article in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A high-precision synchronization and centroid-based framework for single-trial decoding of perceived natural speech.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Individuals affected by severe motor impairments often have no means of communicating with others. To build an intuitive speech prosthesis, imagined speech brain-computer interface research began to prosper with numerous studies attempting to classify imagined speech from brain signals. While unimodal neuroimaging techniques, such as electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) have been widely used, multimodal approaches combining two or more of them remain scarce. Methods: In this study offline phoneme decoding based on hybrid EEG-fNIRS data was performed. Twenty-two right-handed participants performed imagined and perceived speech trials encompassing four phonemes /a/,/i/,/b/ and /k/. Features in the form of power spectral densities and mean hemoglobin concentration changes were extracted from EEG and fNIRS data, respectively. Features were ranked according to the mutual information criterion relative to the target vector, and the optimal number of features to include was determined through optimization via 10-fold cross-validation. Results: Hybrid classification yielded accuracy scores of 77.29% and 76.05% regarding imagined and perceived speech, respectively. In both conditions, hybrid and EEG-based classification performances did not differ significantly, while fNIRS based phoneme discrimination produced lower accuracies. Discussion: This study represents an innovative phoneme decoding attempt based on multimodal EEG-fNIRS data, both in terms of imagined speech and perception. Four-class imagined speech classification was primarily driven by EEG features yet outperformed comparable previous studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.