Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743816›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroergonomics2026

Hybrid EEG-fNIRS phoneme classification based on imagined and perceived speech.

Manuel Hons, Silvia Erika Kober, Selina Christin Wriessnegger, Guilherme Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroergonomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manuel HonsDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Silvia Erika KoberDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Selina Christin WriessneggerInstitute of Neural Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.
Guilherme WoodDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals affected by severe motor impairments often have no means of communicating with others. To build an intuitive speech prosthesis, imagined speech brain-computer interface research began to prosper with numerous studies attempting to classify imagined speech from brain signals. While unimodal neuroimaging techniques, such as electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) have been widely used, multimodal approaches combining two or more of them remain scarce. Methods: In this study offline phoneme decoding based on hybrid EEG-fNIRS data was performed. Twenty-two right-handed participants performed imagined and perceived speech trials encompassing four phonemes /a/,/i/,/b/ and /k/. Features in the form of power spectral densities and mean hemoglobin concentration changes were extracted from EEG and fNIRS data, respectively. Features were ranked according to the mutual information criterion relative to the target vector, and the optimal number of features to include was determined through optimization via 10-fold cross-validation. Results: Hybrid classification yielded accuracy scores of 77.29% and 76.05% regarding imagined and perceived speech, respectively. In both conditions, hybrid and EEG-based classification performances did not differ significantly, while fNIRS based phoneme discrimination produced lower accuracies. Discussion: This study represents an innovative phoneme decoding attempt based on multimodal EEG-fNIRS data, both in terms of imagined speech and perception. Four-class imagined speech classification was primarily driven by EEG features yet outperformed comparable previous studies.

Indexed as

Brain-computer-interface (BCI)classificationelectroencephalography (EEG)functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)hybridimagined speechmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41743816
PMCPMC12929534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.