ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2025
Use of Doppler ultrasound in diagnosing pacemaker-related subclavian vein occlusion following biventricular pacemaker replacement.
Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Subclavian vein occlusion (SVO) is a common complication following pacemaker implantation. Aim: The study aimed to determine the long-term incidence of SVO following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation using venous Doppler ultrasonography (USG). Material and methods: This cross-sectional study included 181 patients who underwent CRT implantation and were due for elective battery replacement. Patients in whom venous Doppler USG examination did not reveal subclavian vein flow were pre-diagnosed with SVO. A definitive diagnosis of SVO was made in patients who were pre-diagnosed with SVO using venography on the day of CRT battery replacement. Patients were divided into two groups as patients with and without SVO. Results: A definitive SVO diagnosis was made in 59 (33%) patients. Patients with SVO were significantly older, were more likely to have hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM), and had longer duration of CRT implantation than patients without SVO. Venous Doppler USG examination revealed that the respirophasic flow disappeared in all patients with SVO, a continuous flow pattern was present, and the axillary vein flow velocity was significantly lower compared to patients without SVO. Variables found to be significantly associated with SVO in univariate analysis were further evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Consequently, DM and advanced age were found to be independent variables significantly predicting SVO ( Conclusions: Approximately one-third of our sample was diagnosed with definitive SVO in the long term after CRT implantation. Venous Doppler USG is a useful, simple and non-invasive method that can be used for the preliminary diagnosis of SVO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.