ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Prehospital Variability of Pediatric Emergency Acuity Assessment Criteria in Japan: A Nationwide Analysis of Fire Department Protocols.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In pediatric emergency care, acuity assessment is required based on age-specific physiological characteristics. However, in Japan, prehospital pediatric acuity d protocols vary regionally in the assessment tools and vital sign criteria used. This study aimed to clarify the differences in assessment tools and vital sign criteria currently used for pediatric acuity determination in Japan. Methods: This study used data from a nationwide survey conducted in August 2024 by the Pediatric Emergency Committee, Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, which targeted emergency medical services supervisors at all 720 fire departments across Japan regarding the presence and content of pediatric acuity determination protocols. Collected protocols were compared and analyzed for differences in assessment tools, vital sign thresholds, and age categorizations. Results: Responses were obtained from 561 departments (77.9%). After consolidation of duplicate prefecture-level protocols, 32 unique pediatric acuity determination protocols were included in the final analysis. Only one protocol fully adhered to the Fire and Disaster Management Agency (FDMA) framework, whereas most protocols were based on the Foundation for Ambulance Service Development (FASD) criteria. The upper and lower limits of vital signs varied, with apparent differences in younger age groups. Age categorizations ranged from three broad divisions to detailed subdivisions. Conclusion: Japan's prehospital pediatric acuity determination shows substantial regional variability, reflected in the identification of multiple distinct protocols and limited real-world adherence to FDMA-based criteria. Nationwide standardization and implementation of FDMA-based criteria should be prioritized before developing new systems, followed by validation in real-world practice to ensure feasibility, equity, and clinical effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.