Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743750›Full record

ReviewCytoJournal2026

Current situation and future prospect of biobank.

Ruizhe Wang, Xiaotong Han, Lvcheng Jin, Zitong Wang, Huimin Sun, Yunxiang Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CytoJournal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruizhe Wang *Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Xiaotong Han *Weifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Lvcheng JinWeifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Zitong WangWeifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Huimin SunWeifang People's Hospital, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, China.
Yunxiang ZhangDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Qingdao Central Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biobanks are essential infrastructures dedicated to the systematic collection, processing, storage, and distribution of biological samples and related data, serving as fundamental resources for biomedical research. Their application ranges from clinical research and epidemiological investigations to public health monitoring, facilitating the identification of disease-associated genetic variations and the exploration of gene-environment interactions. Biobanks provide valuable resources for systems biology and interdisciplinary research, significantly broadening the scope and depth of scientific inquiry. This review explores the development history, current landscape, and future prospects of global biobanking initiatives, highlighting notable advancements in technological innovation and methodological practices. It also scrutinizes prevailing challenges and envisions future trajectories for development. In the era of personalized medicine, biobanks are expected to play a more critical role by providing the data and samples needed for the development of individualized therapies. By surmounting existing impediments and fostering international collaboration, biobanks are poised to propel scientific breakthroughs and elevate global healthcare standards. This article aims to comprehensively elucidate the trajectory of biobanking development and its profound influence on biomedical research.

Indexed as

BiobankBiomedical researchEthical IssuesManagementStandardization

Identifiers

PMID41743750
PMCPMC12931191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.