ReviewJournal of medical education and curricular development
A Scoping Review of the Use of Cinema Education in Training Medical Preceptors.
Review in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medical students' education is strongly influenced by learning experiences with their preceptors. Continuing education programs (CEPs) are an excellent vehicle for training preceptors who supervise students in clinical settings. Continuing education programs sometimes include innovative teaching strategies such as cinema education, meaning the use of film in medical education. This study explores the use of cinema education in training medical preceptors, focusing on the type of cinema education used, the content presented, its application and its evaluation. Method: This review was planned and conducted in accordance with the steps described by Arksey and O'Malley, and in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Primary sources searched included Medline, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsychINFO, ERIC, Education Source, and Scopus. All studies conducted with preceptors were included. All research designs detailing the use of cinema education in training for preceptors were considered. The articles were processed and evaluated by 2 pairs of reviewers using the COVIDENCE tool and then synthesized in narrative form. Results: Of the 4719 studies reviewed, 14 were selected for extraction. This scoping review shows that cinema education is used chiefly in the form of video mini-series. The videos are generally viewed remotely in asynchronous mode, and they typically feature simulated clinical situations designed to develop preceptors' feedback skills. The videos are normally evaluated through post-screening surveys. Conclusion: This scoping review examined the type (format), content, application, and evaluation of cinema education in training programs for medical preceptors. The predominant format consisted of a series of video clips depicting clinical scenarios. Most of the videos were designed to enable preceptors to develop their feedback skills. The videos were mainly viewed remotely in asynchronous mode. Future studies could assess how effective cinema education is in training medical preceptors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.