Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743740›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026

CT-based radiomics in predicting the efficacy of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hongyang Chen, Bingjie Fan, Mengqi Yuan, Dandan Wang, Chenxi Qiao, Na Qiu, Xiaomin Quan, Wei Hou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hongyang Chen *Department of Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Bingjie Fan *Department of Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Mengqi YuanCapital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dandan WangDepartment of Oncology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chenxi QiaoDepartment of Oncology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Na QiuDepartment of Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiaomin QuanFaculty of Chinese Medicine and State Key Laboratory of Mechanism and Quality of Chinese Medicine, Macao University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China.
Wei HouDepartment of Oncology, Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly improves surgical resection rates, major pathological response rates (MPR), pathological complete response rates (pCR), and survival rates in patients with resectable NSCLC. Through systematic reviews and meta-analyses, we examined the diagnostic value of CT-based predictive models in predicting neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy treatment outcomes for NSCLC. Method: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science databases, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang were systematically searched up to January 12, 2026. To assess study risk of bias and quality, we employed the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool and the Radiomics Quality Score version 2.0(RQS). Diagnostic accuracy of radiomics for detecting neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy pathological response in NSCLC patients was evaluated by calculating the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for each study. Results: The meta-analysis analyzed 17 studies with 4,510 individual subjects. The pooled AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of internal validation models were 0.81, 0.79, and 0.69, respectively. The pooled AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of external validation models were 0.80, 0.75, and 0.73, accordingly. Subgroup analyses revealed that models using deep learning (DL) algorithms demonstrated superior sensitivity (internal: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.85; external: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.72-0.82) and specificity (internal: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.85; external: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.68-0.78) compared to those using machine learning (ML). Models predicting MPR exhibited higher sensitivity in internal validation (0.82, 95% CI: 0.77-0.86), while showing higher specificity in external validation (0.76, 95% CI: 0.72-0.81). In contrast, models predicting pCR demonstrated the opposite pattern. Features selected using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) demonstrated significantly higher pooled sensitivity (internal: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80-0.89; external: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.87) and specificity (internal: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.63-0.78; external: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.82) compared to non-ICC-selected features. When stratified by the median Radiomics Quality Score (RQS ≥ 41.07%), higher-scoring studies were associated with lower pooled sensitivity (internal: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84; external: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66-0.76) but a trend toward higher specificity. Finally, models based on two-dimensional regions of interest (2D ROI) demonstrated higher pooled sensitivity (internal: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.80-0.92; external: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96) and specificity in external validation (0.80, 95% CI: 0.68-0.91). Conclusion: Due to its good diagnostic accuracy, widespread use, and low cost, CT-based radiomics can be used to predict the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC preoperatively. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier (CRD420251174128).

Indexed as

computed tomographymeta-analysisneoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapynon-small cell lung cancerprediction model

Identifiers

PMID41743740
PMCPMC12929539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.