Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743675›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Extending BEHRT to UK Biobank: assessing transformer model performance in clinical prediction.

Yusuf Yildiz, Goran Nenadic, Meghna Jani, David A Jenkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yusuf YildizFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Goran NenadicDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Meghna JaniCentre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
David A JenkinsFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Transformer-based models have shown strong potential for clinical prediction using electronic health record data, yet their performance can vary depending on modelling decisions and data characteristics. Methods: In this study, we trained a BEHRT model on hospital-based UK Biobank data and evaluated its performance across four clinical prediction tasks, including next-visit diagnosis and longer-term diagnosis prediction up to five years. We exhaustively assessed the impact of model size, medical terminology (CALIBER vs ICD-10), and data split strategies. Results: The large model consistently outperformed the smaller one in long-term prediction tasks (AUROC = 0.874 vs 0.858 at 5 years), while differences were marginal in 6-months prediction tasks. Performance was also sensitive to the vocabulary size, with CALIBER model yielding higher average precision scores (Average Precision Score = 0.773 vs 0.678 using ICD-10). Discussion: Our results show that transformer models can achieve high predictive performance across diverse clinical scenarios, but outcomes vary considerably depending on modelling choices, particularly in long-term prediction tasks.

Indexed as

clinical prediction modelshealth informaticslarge language modelsmedical terminologymodelling choicestransformers

Identifiers

PMID41743675
PMCPMC12929515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.