ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Training without Harm: Rethinking Ethics, Simulation and the Evolving Future of Medical Education in West Africa.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As global healthcare systems evolve, medical training must advance not only in content but also in its moral responsibility to the learners, patients, and society. This perspective paper examines how well-intentioned training systems can inadvertently cause harm and argues for reframing medical education around applied expressions of the classical bioethics principles of safety, equity, and future readiness. Beyond traditional concerns such as consent and confidentiality, it highlights the structural dimensions of ethics: training equity, learner safety, and institutional accountability. Drawing on global and regional evidence, simulation-based medical education is presented not merely as a pedagogical innovation but as an ethical imperative that improves performance, reduces procedural errors, and enhances learner confidence. Drawing on these concerns, the paper introduces the SAFE Training Framework - Safety, Alignment, Faculty development, and Evaluation - as a practical model for embedding ethics into medical education. The conceptual framework emphasizes four essential anchors: ensuring Safety for learners and patients, Aligning training with ethical and contextual values, empowering Faculty through development and support, and Evaluating competence through authentic, future-oriented assessment. This framework, targeted at medical educators, training institutions, policymakers, and accrediting bodies responsible for shaping health-workforce quality and patient safety, can inform curriculum design and accreditation standards for medical education in Low- and Middle-Income countries. The discussion also addresses emerging challenges in the age of artificial intelligence, calling for balance between innovation and integrity in assessment. Strengthening health systems in West Africa and beyond will require more than moral intent; it demands practical, ethically grounded approaches to capacity building across every stage of medical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.