ReviewCurrent research in food science2026
Emerging inorganic nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors for heavy metal detection in food: Advances, challenges, and prospects.
Review in Current research in food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The review focuses on the application of inorganic nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors in heavy metal detection in food, systematically outlining their technical principles, performance challenges, and development prospects. Heavy metals are among the most concerning food contaminants due to their high toxicity at trace levels, persistence, and bioaccumulation, creating an urgent need for rapid and reliable screening in complex food matrices. Electrochemical sensors-particularly stripping voltammetry-based platforms-offer high sensitivity, low detection limits, and fast response, but their practical performance is frequently constrained by matrix-induced fouling, ion interference, and inconsistent validation protocols. This review focuses on inorganic nanomaterial-engineered working electrodes (metals, metal oxides, carbon nanomaterials, and their composites) for food-related heavy-metal analysis, and provides a food-matrix-oriented structure-function-performance framework that links material roles (selective preconcentration, catalytic signal amplification, and antifouling interfaces) to analytical outcomes (sensitivity, selectivity, stability, and recovery). Representative electrode fabrication routes and commonly used testing settings are summarized together with essential material/electrode characterizations and electrochemical diagnostics. Importantly, we derive actionable conclusions for food-safety deployment: accurate quantification in real foods is dominated by antifouling and selective enrichment rather than sensitivity alone; performance claims should be benchmarked by standardized sample pretreatment, interference panels, and recovery in representative foods; and electrochemical results require cross-validation against reference methods (e.g., inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)/atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS)). Finally, we propose a practical reporting checklist and highlight scalable pathways toward portable, multiplexed, and regulation-aligned heavy-metal monitoring in diverse food products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.