ArticleAdvances in health information science and practice2026
From Expansion to Expiration: Federal Policy Waivers and Telehealth Utilization in US Primary Care (2016-2024).
Article in Advances in health information science and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of Telehealth has fluctuated over the past 8 years, with events such as the COVID-19 pandemic driving considerable growth in usage. During the COVID-19 pandemic, federal policy waivers were enacted to have Medicare cover costs for synchronous telehealth visits, increasing accessibility to telehealth during a public health emergency. Although waivers temporarily expanded access, sustainable, equitable telehealth access continues to heavily depend on overlooked factors such as technological accessibility, broadband availability, disability accommodations, and insurance status, particularly in rural and underserved populations. With these federal waivers set to expire on December 31, 2025, it is critical to evaluate the effectiveness and long-term impact of such federal policy waivers and to determine whether these have meaningfully improved telehealth access or have merely delayed underlying inequities. Methods: In this scoping review, the authors aimed to evaluate the impact of federal policy waivers on the utilization of synchronous telehealth with a focus on primary care across the United States from 2016 to 2024. Database searches across PubMed, SCOPUS, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycINFO yielded 137 unique references. Two screening stages resulted in 19 articles that met all evaluation criteria for review inclusion. Results: A review of the existing literature showed a common theme, in that federal waivers primarily affected telehealth usage by altering key social determinants of health and structural accessibility-driving both overuse in some populations and underuse in others. The most significant impact of the waivers was removal of geographic restrictions, particularly benefiting disadvantaged and rural communities. Studies noted that following the expiration of the waivers, patients-especially those seeking care across state lines-were less likely to attend either telemedicine or in-person visits, highlighting an immediate reduction in care access. Conclusions: Overall, previous studies have emphasized that sustaining telehealth access depends less on awareness efforts and more on addressing implementation barriers, particularly for nonambulatory, transportation-dependent, and financially disadvantaged populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.