ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Navigating preanalytical challenges: a real-world study on single-tube pneumatic tube systems.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pneumatic tube systems (PTS) accelerate the transport of samples in the laboratory but may lead to preanalytical hemolysis. Samples may rest before transport during busy times, but the effect on test accuracy is unclear. This study presents a novel single-tube PTS with a secondary deceleration device and LIS integration, evaluating its impact on routine biochemical parameters and examining the effects of prolonged sample resting times before PTS transport. Methods: In a prospective study of 34 outpatients, four blood samples per participant were collected in silica-clot activator tubes. Samples were randomly allocated to: immediate PTS transport (Group A), PTS after 15-min rest (B), PTS after 30-min rest (C), or manual delivery (Group D). All samples from each subject were centrifuged and analyzed simultaneously upon arrival. Twenty-two biochemical parameters were measured; results for PTS groups were compared to the manual control, with bias assessed against ±1/2 total allowable error (±1/2TEa). Results: The hemolysis index (HI) was negative for both PTS and HD groups. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were significantly elevated in all PTS groups versus manual delivery ( Conclusion: The single-tube PTS is suitable for transporting blood specimens for biochemical analysis. To maintain the reliability of biochemical results from silica-clot activator tubes, laboratories should minimize pre-transport delays and include resting time as a critical variable in PTS validation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.