ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
Entropy-dependent human motor modulation consistent with morphological computation in a single subject.
Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Morphological computation (MC)-the idea that body mechanics contribute to computation-has been widely explored in robotics and examined in humans from a physiological perspective. In this study, we report a behavioral pattern consistent with MC under temporal uncertainty. This proof-of-concept single-subject study examined whether human motor control shows behavioral signatures consistent with MC within a temporal-preparation paradigm. One participant completed 160 trials across four entropy levels (0, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 bits) in two tasks: a low-embodiment button-pressing movement and a high-embodiment reaching movement. The reaching movement tended to show decreasing response variability (coefficient of variation, CV) with increasing temporal uncertainty, whereas the button-pressing movement tended to remain flat or slightly increase. Reaction time (RT) patterns also diverged: RTs tended to lengthen with longer foreperiods in the reaching condition but shortened in the button-pressing movement. Moreover, spatial accuracy in the reaching movement tended to improve across foreperiods. These adaptations emerged without explicit strategy instructions, may reflect sensitivity to temporal context. Taken together, these patterns appear consistent with MC-inspired accounts in which limb mechanics and modest co-contraction may filter temporal uncertainty rather than amplify it. Although constrained by a single-subject, four-level design, the findings offer preliminary evidence that is suggestive of embodied-intelligence principles that may generalize to human motor control, highlighting commonalities between biological and robotic systems in brain-body-environment dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.