ArticlePlant direct2026
Low-Cost Custom-Built Flow Meters for Plant Hydraulic Conductance: Validation of Accuracy, Precision, and Reproducibility.
Article in Plant direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurement of xylem hydraulic conductance provides access to xylem hydraulic conductivity and vulnerability to cavitation, two key traits for assessing plant sensitivity to environmental stressors. We evaluated the performance of custom-built low-cost pressure drop flow meters through nearly 1200 measurements across devices, laboratories, reservoir heights (10, 25 and 45 cm, used to induce pressure head and drive water flux) and PEEK tubing of hydraulic contrasting resistances. Flow meters were interchangeable, with mean differences generally < 3.5% and never exceeding 5%, with 88.9% of comparative tests showing no significant difference. Under recommended conditions (25-45 cm pressure head, downstream-to-upstream pressure ratio ≈0.5), precision reached 1%-7% coefficient of variation. Accuracy, assessed against reference values obtained by water displacement, was also strong, with 68% of measurements deviating by < 5% from reference values and over 78% when measured at {greater than or equal to}25 cm. At 10 cm, performance declined because sensor deviations represented a larger fraction of pressure differential, and low-resistance PEEK tubing increased absolute but not relative error. Validated flow meters proved portable, affordable (≈2500 CAD), and reliable. Their low cost, open-source interface, and publicly available construction protocol make them accessible to laboratories with limited resources, enabling reproducible multi-laboratory studies of plant hydraulics and fostering international collaborations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.