ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2026
Myopia Control Efficacy of Grid Dimension Multiregion Spectacle Lenses: A One-Year Randomized Double-Masked Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Myopia Control Efficacy of Grid Dimension Multiregion Spectacle Lenses: A One-Year Randomized Double-Masked Controlled Trial.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of grid dimension multiregion (GDM) spectacle lenses in myopia control and compare the myopia control effects between GDM and highly aspherical lenslets (HAL) spectacle lenses. Methods: A total of 150 children aged 6-13 years were enrolled at the Hangzhou Campus of Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between December 2022 and July 2023 and randomly assigned to the GDM and HAL groups. Cycloplegic autorefraction (spherical equivalent refraction [SER]) and axial length (AL) were measured at baseline and 6-month intervals until one year follow-up. Results: 131 participants completed the study and were included in the final analysis. At the six-month follow-up, the changes in SER and AL were 0.06 ± 0.37 D and 0.01 ± 0.11 mm in the GDM group and -0.06 ± 0.31 D and 0.04 ± 0.11 mm in the HAL group, respectively. The GDM group showed a statistically significant difference in SER changes compared to the HAL group ( Conclusions: Both GDM and HAL lenses effectively controlled myopia progression over 1 year, with GDM showing slightly superior efficacy in limiting axial elongation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.