ArticleOncoscience2026
Massive calcified solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreatic head.
Article in Oncoscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is an uncommon, low-grade malignant tumor, accounting for less than 3% of all exocrine pancreatic neoplasms. Although typically indolent, SPN poses significant diagnostic challenges and must be distinguished from other pancreatic tumors to guide appropriate management. We present the case of a 31-year-old woman with a two-year history of right upper abdominal pain which had recently worsened. Laboratory investigations, including tumor markers, were within normal limits. Imaging revealed a massive, lobulated pancreatic head tumor with solid, cystic, and calcified components. The mass was in close contact with the duodenum, the splenomesenteric confluence, and the right colic flexure, without evidence of invasion. The patient underwent a cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple procedure). Gross examination showed a well-encapsulated 12.5 × 9 × 8 cm mass with cystic degeneration, hemorrhage, and coarse calcifications. Histological examination revealed solid and pseudopapillary architecture with low mitotic activity and degenerative changes. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated positivity for β-catenin and CD10, confirming the diagnosis of SPN. Complete surgical resection is associated with an excellent prognosis, although rare aggressive behavior has been reported. This case underscores the diagnostic value of integrating imaging, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry. It also highlights the importance of considering SPN in the differential diagnosis of large, calcified pancreatic masses in young women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.