ReviewAnnals of pediatric cardiology
Transjugular intravenous leadless pacemaker implantation in pediatric patients: A case report and literature review.
Review in Annals of pediatric cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ethical dilemmas in pediatric cardiac interventions:Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leadless pacemaker (LPM) implantation in pediatric patients is increasingly considered as an alternative to conventional pacemakers, especially when femoral venous access is not feasible. We present the case of a 7-year-old child with Mobitz type II second-degree atrioventricular block who successfully underwent LPM implantation via the right internal jugular vein due to inadequate femoral vein diameter. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to summarize the outcomes of internal jugular vein approach in children. The transjugular approach demonstrates several advantages, including suitability for larger sheaths, reduced vascular complications, shorter implantation path, stable mid-septal positioning, and faster recovery. Preoperative evaluation of venous anatomy and patient-specific factors is critical. Although pericardial effusion and sensing issues may occur, the internal jugular vein represents a safe and effective alternative for LPM implantation in selected pediatric patients when femoral access is contraindicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.