Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743456›Full record

ReviewAPL bioengineering2026

Biobased adhesive hydrogels for wound management and tissue repair: From materials to advanced applications.

Dongyang Miao, Yige Gao, Bowen Shi, Wen Zhou, Dong Wang, Jichao Zhang, Jun Song, Miao Cui, Shuo Shi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in APL bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dongyang MiaoState Key Laboratory for the Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, Joint Laboratory of Advanced Biomedical Materials (NFU-UGent), Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0987-8031
Yige GaoState Key Laboratory for the Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, Joint Laboratory of Advanced Biomedical Materials (NFU-UGent), Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Bowen ShiState Key Laboratory for the Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, Joint Laboratory of Advanced Biomedical Materials (NFU-UGent), Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Wen ZhouJiangsu Engineering Research Center for Digital Textile Inkjet Printing, Key Laboratory of Eco-Textile, Jiangnan University, Ministry of Education, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China.
Dong WangJiangsu Engineering Research Center for Digital Textile Inkjet Printing, Key Laboratory of Eco-Textile, Jiangnan University, Ministry of Education, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China.
Jichao ZhangJiangsu Engineering Research Center for Digital Textile Inkjet Printing, Key Laboratory of Eco-Textile, Jiangnan University, Ministry of Education, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214122, China.
Jun SongCollege of Textile and Clothing, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, People's Republic of China.
Miao CuiDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Shuo ShiSchool of Fashion and Textiles, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5170-8509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective tissue adhesion under wet and dynamic physiological conditions remains a major challenge in wound management and tissue repair. Conventional tissue adhesives often suffer from limited biocompatibility, inadequate wet adhesion, or lack of degradability, restricting their broader clinical use. In recent years, biobased adhesive hydrogels have emerged as promising alternatives owing to their intrinsic biocompatibility, tunable mechanical properties, and capability to achieve robust adhesion in complex biological environments. In addition to being passive sealants, recent developments have made these materials smartly responsive to various stimuli (pH, temperature, light, magnetic field, ultrasound), achieving multifunctional and on-demand treatment performance. This review summarizes recent advances in biobased adhesive hydrogels, with emphasis on material design strategies, interfacial adhesion mechanisms, evaluation methodologies, and representative biomedical applications. Particular attention is given to how biobased materials address the challenges of wet-tissue adhesion, mechanical mismatch, and dynamic tissue interfaces. Finally, current limitations and future development directions are discussed, including translational challenges, minimally invasive applications, and the integration of multifunctionality with clinical practicality. This review aims to provide guidance for the rational design and clinical translation of next-generation biobased adhesive hydrogels.

Identifiers

PMID41743456
PMCPMC12931969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.