ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Sand-based therapy in pediatrics: a narrative review of traditional and digital sand therapy.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sand-based therapies, forms of play therapy, have been used to address emotional, behavioral, and psychosocial difficulties in children. Verbalizations, nonverbal cues, and depictions in the sand are used by therapists to assess client progress. In contrast, digital sand therapy uses digital apps or platforms to facilitate similar therapeutic processes. This narrative review examines the current state of evidence for sand-based therapies in pediatric populations with particular attention to the presence or absence of empirical research on digital sand therapy and their outcome measures. Methods: Inclusion criteria consisted of quantitative or mixed-methods sand-based therapy studies published between 2005 and 2025, involving pediatric populations and published in peer-reviewed journals. Searches were performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, Perplexity AI, and the University of British Columbia library. Results: A total of 130 articles were identified. After screening, eight articles satisfied the inclusion criteria; there were no studies included that used virtual or digital sand-based therapy. All traditional sand-based therapy studies reported significant improvements in experimental groups. However, methodological limitations were common, including small sample sizes, a lack of between group comparisons, and an overall lack of objective outcome measures. Discussion: While traditional sand-based therapy studies suggest its potential effectiveness, marked limitations constrain the interpretations of these findings. Despite the promise and strengths of digital alternatives to traditional sand therapy, no empirical studies to date have examined their use in pediatric populations. While digital sandplay and sandtray platforms and applications exist, their clinical effectiveness has not yet been empirically studied. Conclusion: This review highlights a need for digital sand-based therapy in pediatric populations as well as standardized, objective measures for session analysis. Future research should explore how digital platforms can be used to enable objective sandtray analysis in pediatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.