ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Effects of affective vs. instructional teacher scaffolding on preschoolers' emotional engagement and social attention in picturebook reading.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emotional support is increasingly recognized as a critical component of effective early childhood education, yet empirical evidence comparing different scaffolding styles during classroom activities remains limited. This study examined how affective versus instructional teacher scaffolding shapes preschool children's emotional engagement during electronic storybook reading. Methods: Forty-one children aged 4-6 years from one preschool were assigned by class to either an affective-scaffolding or instructional-scaffolding condition. Children's regular classroom teachers, who received prior training, implemented the assigned scaffolding style while reading a 20-page digital picture book. Multimodal measures of engagement were collected, including eye-tracking data, children's self-reports using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM), teacher ratings, and behavioral observations. Semi-structured interviews with children and teachers complemented the quantitative data. Results: Compared with instructional scaffolding, affective scaffolding led to significantly higher positive emotional experiences, reflected in greater emotional valence and arousal. Children in the affective condition also showed increased social attention, indexed by longer gaze duration on characters' faces, and more frequent overt emotional engagement behaviors, without reduced attention to text. Engagement indicators were moderately intercorrelated, and qualitative findings converged with quantitative results, indicating higher perceived engagement under affective scaffolding. Discussion: The findings suggest that integrating emotional support into preschool reading activities can enhance children's emotional involvement and focused participation. Affective scaffolding appears to be a trainable and assessable instructional strategy that promotes more holistic engagement in early childhood learning contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.