ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
Using ratings of perceived difficulty for balance exercise prescription and intensity progression.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Balance is a fundamental component of daily activities and plays a critical role in preventing falls. Balance can be influenced by a variety of factors, including age-related physiological changes, making it important to consider age when assessing balance performance. However, an empirical basis for estimating the difficulty of balance exercises has yet to be developed. The primary aim of this study was to determine the effect of age and different balance exercise conditions on difficulty of exercises as determined by self-reported perceived difficulty, and to show that Rating of Perceived Difficulty (RPD) can serve as a practical measure of difficulty for guiding balance exercise prescription and progression. Methods: Sixty-two healthy adults between the ages of 20 and 85 years with a mean age of 55 ± 20 years (50% female) participated in this cross-sectional study. Subjects performed four 30 s trials of 24 static standing balance exercises, and the average of these four trials was used for analysis. For each exercise, subjects' ratings of perceived difficulty (RPD) were recorded using a 0-10 scale. Results: A significant increase in RPD across all balance exercises occurred as age increased ( Conclusion: RPD measurements across a range of standing balance exercises can be used as a measure of difficulty and a practical tool for prescribing and progressing balance exercises in rehabilitation programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.