ReviewGlobal health & medicine2026
Japan's high-quality healthcare system despite physician shortages: Exploring the paradox and pathways toward sustainable healthcare.
Review in Global health & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disproportionate expansion of radical prostatectomy among older men in Japan in the robotic surgery era: a nationwide descriptive time series analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with 30-Day Non-Return to Pre-Hospital Residence in Older Patients Hospitalized with Pneumonia or Lower Respiratory Tract Infection: The Role of Serum Albumin and Early Treatment Failure.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating medical Mobility as a Service (MaaS) with the doctor-to-patient with nurse (D to P with N) telemedicine model and pharmacist-supported medication services: Towards mobility-integrated care for Japan's super-aged population.Global health & medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Japan's rapidly aging population presents significant demographic pressures, and yet the country maintains high standards of healthcare delivery with remarkably low rates of preventable and treatable mortality. According to the latest data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Japan ranks 35th among 38 countries in physician density (2.6 per 1,000 population), and yet it records 12.1 physician consultations per person per year-among the highest in the OECD. This article analyzes this paradoxical situation-where high medical performance is maintained despite relatively few physicians-by examining both institutional strengths and emerging vulnerabilities. The strengths include universal health insurance with high public funding; a resource-intensive medical infrastructure; and a robust support network of allied healthcare professionals. Simultaneously, we identify the following vulnerabilities: increasing demand intensity; shortages and an uneven distribution of physicians; hospital financial losses; the limitations of effective gatekeeping under free access systems; and the amplified workload resulting from the concentration of authority and responsibility among physicians. Moreover, we examine initiatives needed to ensure the sustainability of insurance-based healthcare, including: redesigning supply-demand planning and education policies; expanding task sharing and securing funding sources; designing incentives for essential and regional healthcare services; and restructuring access models to value-based utilization and need-based care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.