ArticleGlobal health & medicine2026
Retrospective observational analysis of prasugrel dosage afterpercutaneous coronary intervention using the Clinical Deep DataAccumulation System database.
Article in Global health & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prasugrel reduces the recurrence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its actual dosage in Japan has not been well studied. This study aimed to compare different prasugrel doses after PCI using retrospective data from the Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System (CLIDAS) database. A retrospective observational study was conducted using the CLIDAS-PCI database with a 2-year follow-up after PCI. There were 2,869 and 52 patients in the 3.75- and 2.5 mg groups, respectively. The 2.5 mg group was comprised of significantly more female, older, shorter, and lower-body-weight patients and included more patients with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, or active malignancy than the 3.75 mg group. Concomitant medications included antiplatelets, anticoagulants, and statins. Laboratory data showed substantially lower hemoglobin and platelet counts in the 2.5 mg group. Most patients weighed < 50 kg; however, fewer had an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m². Major adverse cardio- and cerebrovascular events were similar between groups. The 2.5 mg group had more non-fatal strokes and major bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy. In Japan, prasugrel 2.5 mg should be considered to reduce major bleeding in patients with low body weight, older adults, women, those receiving concomitant antithrombotic therapy, and those with low platelet counts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.