ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Evaluation of Popularity, Reliability, and Quality of Dental and Oral Microbiology Videos on YouTube as Sources of Dental Education.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Popularity, Reliability, and Quality of Dental and Oral Microbiology Videos on YouTube as Sources of Dental Education.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The expansion of teaching resources in dental education has changed significantly because of the growth of digital video platforms. However, questions remain about their reliability and quality. This study aims to evaluate the popularity, reliability, and quality of YouTube videos on dental and oral microbiology. Materials and Methods: Two search phrases were used to identify 200 videos, and the video power index (VPI) was utilized to evaluate popularity based on views, likes, and dislikes. The GQS scoring system was used to measure the videos' quality, and JAMA and modified DISCERN tools were used to assess their reliability. Results: Analyzed videos were classified into four categories: poor, moderate, good, and excellent. VPI of the 61 videos analyzed was moderate (0.06), and JAMA and mDISCERN both achieved low excellent reliability ratings (9.8% and 3.3%), respectively. However, only 6.6% of the videos received a GQS quality rating of excellent. Conclusion: YouTube algorithms favor shorter content for student engagement and influence the video's popularity. The absence of stringent standards for reliability and quality during production led to the conclusion that a significant proportion of videos was educationally ineffective. Thus, it is essential that educators carefully plan, write reliably, and produce high-quality videos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.