Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743341›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026

Evaluation of Popularity, Reliability, and Quality of Dental and Oral Microbiology Videos on YouTube as Sources of Dental Education.

Ahmed Hashim, Anil Bangalore Shivappa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmed HashimDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Hassa, 31982, Saudi Arabia, kfu.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5079-3203
Anil Bangalore ShivappaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al-Hassa, 31982, Saudi Arabia, kfu.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1432-5167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The expansion of teaching resources in dental education has changed significantly because of the growth of digital video platforms. However, questions remain about their reliability and quality. This study aims to evaluate the popularity, reliability, and quality of YouTube videos on dental and oral microbiology. Materials and Methods: Two search phrases were used to identify 200 videos, and the video power index (VPI) was utilized to evaluate popularity based on views, likes, and dislikes. The GQS scoring system was used to measure the videos' quality, and JAMA and modified DISCERN tools were used to assess their reliability. Results: Analyzed videos were classified into four categories: poor, moderate, good, and excellent. VPI of the 61 videos analyzed was moderate (0.06), and JAMA and mDISCERN both achieved low excellent reliability ratings (9.8% and 3.3%), respectively. However, only 6.6% of the videos received a GQS quality rating of excellent. Conclusion: YouTube algorithms favor shorter content for student engagement and influence the video's popularity. The absence of stringent standards for reliability and quality during production led to the conclusion that a significant proportion of videos was educationally ineffective. Thus, it is essential that educators carefully plan, write reliably, and produce high-quality videos.

Indexed as

dental microbiologyoral microbiologypopularityqualityreliabilityYouTube

Identifiers

PMID41743341
PMCPMC12930204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.