Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743336›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

What Team Science leaders really want: leveraging the knowledge of CTSA-based Team Science leaders to advance the Science of Team Science.

Betsy Rolland, Kristine M Glauber, Wayne T McCormack, Kevin Wooten, Heather J Risser, Allan R Brasier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Betsy RollandInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Kristine M GlauberClinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.
Wayne T McCormackDepartment of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Kevin WootenCollege of Business, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX, United States.
Heather J RisserDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Allan R BrasierInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
UTMB CTSA: Greater Gulf Coast Translational Science AllianceUM1TR005443 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI Randall J Urban · 2025 to 2026
$8.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR005443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs invest substantial resources in facilitating a Team Science approach to research. Despite over 15 years of Science of Team Science research, the field lacks evidence-based interventions that can be implemented by CTSA hubs and others in support of collaborative research. Federal funding agencies increasingly call for team-based research but devote few resources to the development, dissemination, and evaluation of Team Science interventions. This lack of feasible interventions leaves CTSA Team Science leaders and Clinical and Translational Research Teams (CTRTs) themselves with few evidence-based options for improving the impact of team-based research. In this project, a group of CTSA Team Science leaders conducted a pilot study to understand this gap better. First, we engaged in a semi-structured needs assessment to answer two questions: (1) What do CTRTs need to thrive in conducting team-based Clinical and Translational Research, and (2) What do CTSA-based Team Science leaders need to build robust Team Science programs that serve CTRTs? Second, we conducted a landscape assessment to identify existing evidence-informed team-based interventions. Third, we designed and launched a hybrid effectiveness-feasibility project. Here, we report on these three activities. Finally, we call for additional funding to support the development, dissemination, and evaluation of these critical interventions.

Indexed as

collaborationcross-CTSA collaborationexploratory studyinterventionsTeam Science educationTeam Science evaluation

Identifiers

PMID41743336
PMCPMC12929508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.