Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743324›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia reports

Staff experiences of percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care: challenges, complications and potential solutions.

M Moran, A Goryanyy, A Haron, C Jay, A Weightman, B McGrath, C Shelton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M MoranAcute Intensive Care Unit Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK.
A GoryanyyAcute Intensive Care Unit Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK.
A HaronManchester Centre for Robotics and AI University of Manchester Manchester UK.
C JayHuman Computer Systems Group, Department of Computer Science University of Manchester Manchester UK.
A WeightmanManchester Centre for Robotics and AI University of Manchester Manchester UK.
B McGrathAcute Intensive Care Unit Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK.
C SheltonDepartment of Anaesthesia, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracheostomies are performed in 10-13% of UK intensive care admissions. While the percutaneous technique is well established, accurate needle insertion can be difficult in patients with obesity or neck swelling. These challenges increase the risk of bleeding, airway loss and injury to neck structures. In anatomically complex cases, patients are referred for surgical tracheostomy, causing delays and additional healthcare costs. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 32 staff across three intensive care units. Participants included consultants, resident doctors, nurses, advanced practitioners and auxiliary staff. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Six themes were identified. Tracheostomy was seen as a skilled, high-risk procedure best learned through supervised practice. Teamwork, equipment and the environment were considered vital to safety. Staff reported varied approaches to planning and performing the procedure, alongside strategies to prevent and manage complications. Participants reflected on how a guidance device might improve accuracy, drawing on experiences of the benefits and challenges of introducing new technologies into complex clinical settings. This study provides insights into tracheostomy practices, safety strategies and the potential role of guidance devices. Our study also presents a comprehensive end-user co-development model for future medical device design.

Indexed as

critical careequipment designpatient safetyqualitative researchtracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID41743324
PMCPMC12930101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.