ArticleAnaesthesia reports
Staff experiences of percutaneous tracheostomy in intensive care: challenges, complications and potential solutions.
Article in Anaesthesia reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tracheostomies are performed in 10-13% of UK intensive care admissions. While the percutaneous technique is well established, accurate needle insertion can be difficult in patients with obesity or neck swelling. These challenges increase the risk of bleeding, airway loss and injury to neck structures. In anatomically complex cases, patients are referred for surgical tracheostomy, causing delays and additional healthcare costs. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 32 staff across three intensive care units. Participants included consultants, resident doctors, nurses, advanced practitioners and auxiliary staff. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Six themes were identified. Tracheostomy was seen as a skilled, high-risk procedure best learned through supervised practice. Teamwork, equipment and the environment were considered vital to safety. Staff reported varied approaches to planning and performing the procedure, alongside strategies to prevent and manage complications. Participants reflected on how a guidance device might improve accuracy, drawing on experiences of the benefits and challenges of introducing new technologies into complex clinical settings. This study provides insights into tracheostomy practices, safety strategies and the potential role of guidance devices. Our study also presents a comprehensive end-user co-development model for future medical device design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.