ArticleEuropean heart journal open2026
Extraction and reimplantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices in patients with non-surgically treated infective endocarditis: a nationwide cohort study.
Article in European heart journal open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED)-related infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines recommend complete CIED extraction; however, the optimal timing for reimplantation remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate CIED reimplantation rates, and outcomes in patients with non-surgically treated IE who underwent CIED extraction. Methods and results: We included all Danish residents ≥18 years diagnosed with first-time IE (2010-2021), with a pre-existing CIED, who underwent CIED extraction without concurrent valve surgery. Data were obtained from Danish nationwide registries. The primary variable of interest was CIED reimplantation within 90 days after extraction. Reimplantation rates were described, and reimplantation status was used to stratify patients for analysis of secondary outcomes, including recurrent IE-related bacteraemia and all-cause mortality within 6 months. Among 661 patients with CIED extraction due to IE, 396 (59.9%) underwent reimplantation within 3 months, with a median of 29 days (IQR:19-42 days). There was no significant difference in the 6 month cumulative incidence of recurrent bacteraemia with IE (2.5% [95% CI:0.95-5.5] vs. 1.8% [95% CI:0.8-3.6] Conclusion: In IE patients who underwent CIED extraction, 60% of patients were reimplanted within 3 months with substantial variation in timing. No significant differences in outcomes were found by reimplantation status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.