ArticleHemaSphere2026
Outcomes of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel for large B-cell lymphoma in the UK.
Article in HemaSphere, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response-adapted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T)-sparing consolidation radiotherapy in high-risk large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL): Results of the prospective RESTART protocol.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Early PET response predicts the risk of relapse after 2L axi-cel in large B-cell lymphoma.Blood advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
48 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following approval of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) as second-line (2 L) treatment for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), results from real-world CAR T cohorts will be key to confirm safety and efficacy in standard practice. We present comprehensive clinical outcomes of LBCL patients intended to be treated with 2 L axi-cel through the UK National CAR T service. Of 345 patients approved for 2 L axi-cel, 302 (87.5%) were infused. The median age was 62 years (range 22-78); 21% were over 70 years. 75% of patients were approved for CAR T within 3 months from end of first-line (1 L) therapy. 42% of patients required pre-apheresis holding therapy, and 97% received bridging therapy. The best overall response rate was 86% (64% complete response). The 12-month OS was 73.9% (95% CI: 68.3-78.7) for infused patients and 1.5 months (0.9-3.0) for patients not proceeding to CAR T. The 12-month PFS was 52.4% (46.3-58.0). In multivariable analysis, advanced stage, male sex, no response to 1 L therapy, high LDH, and high CRP pre-infusion were independently associated with PFS. Grade ≥3 CRS and ICANS rates were 5% and 18%, respectively. Outcomes in patients aged ≥70 years were similar to the younger population. In this large UK real-world cohort of 2 L axi-cel in LBCL, we demonstrate efficacy and toxicity outcomes comparable to the pivotal ZUMA-7 trial, despite 42% patients requiring urgent holding therapy. Outcomes were favorable in patients aged ≥70 years, supporting the use of 2 L CAR T in older fit patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.