ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
A systematic umbrella review on the impact of elite sport on participation in physical activity and sport.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To legitimize the rising public spending on elite sport, governments and political stakeholders frequently refer to the potential beneficial effects of elite sport for society. A frequently given argument centers on the idea that elite sport has a demonstration effect, inspiring people in terms of their participation in physical activity and sport, so that financial support for elite sport will ultimately also reach the grass-roots level. In this systematic umbrella review, we summarize the findings from previous reviews on the actual impact of elite sport on three, partially overlapping dimensions of participation: physical activity, sport, and voluntary work. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines, we searched four electronic databases (APA PsycINFO, PubMed/Medline, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science), complemented by a reference and citation screening. Two independent reviewers screened all identified studies for eligibility. Of the 1.005 search results, 13 reviews were included in the final analysis. Their methodological quality was assessed by using an adapted version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Checklist for systematic reviews with meta-analysis of observational studies. The synthesis of the reviews' findings does not allow for any firm conclusions to be made about elite sport's impact on voluntary work, while a large number of research studies in relation to physical activity and sport, especially in the context of major sport events, can be observed. However, regardless of the conceptual understanding of physical activity or sport, there is only limited evidence for an inherent demonstration effect on various dimensions of participation in physical activity and sport, suggesting that any potential impact of elite sport needs to be leveraged by other supporting activities. Besides highlighting existing findings on relevant success and failure conditions, this umbrella review also elaborates on the significant research gaps that need to be explored in future studies to stimulate a more differentiated and candid debate regarding the role of elite sport for the general participation in physical activity and sport. Systematic Review Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MKT3Y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.