ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Validation of the behavioral regulation in cycling to and from school scale among students from Germany.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevalence of total physical activity among children and adolescents in Germany is reported to be low (D-) according to the country-specific Report Card from 2022. One potential strategy to increase physical activity is the promotion of cycling to and from school. To foster a more self-determined form of motivation among students, we developed a promising intervention grounded in the self-determination theory, as demonstrated in previous research. Here, we aimed to validate the "German behavioral regulation in cycling to and from school scale" focusing on construct and criterion validity as well as reliability to create a robust measurement instrument. Conducted in Southern Germany in 2021, this study involved 112 girls, 124 boys, and three students identifying as diverse (13.5 ± 1.1 years) who attended a (sub)urban secondary school that provided an intermediate and/or high educational level. We were unable to validate the original first-order six-factor model. Instead, we successfully validated a newly developed first-order three-factor model, which demonstrated a good global model fit (GFI: 0.997, SRMR: 0.0313), measurement model invariance across gender (GFI: 0.986-0.994, SRMR: 0.0426-0.0596), and internal consistency (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.