Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743256›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

Perceptual consensus on cross-country ski-snow performance: a questionnaire study of experts and non-experts.

Anton Kalén, Joakim Abrahamsson, Kalle Kalliorinne, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Andreas Almqvist

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anton KalénDigital Services and Systems, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Joakim AbrahamssonStudent, Researcher and Educational Support, Professional Services, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Kalle KalliorinneMachine Elements, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Hans-Christer HolmbergMachine Elements, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Andreas AlmqvistMachine Elements, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Understanding how skiers and ski technicians perceive snow conditions and ski preparation is essential for optimising glide performance in cross-country (XC) skiing. While tribological research has established how snow microstructure, water-film formation, and ski-snow interactions influence friction, comparatively little is known about how skiers and ski technicians interpret these mechanisms in practice. Methods: We therefore conducted a nationwide questionnaire study ( Results: Agreement varied systematically across topics: the highest consensus was found for perceived ski speed on different snow types and structure selection, while the lowest was observed for glide determinants, paired glide tests involving skier mass, and double-poling positioning. Experts showed higher within-group agreement for perceived ski speed in skate-skiing and on moist transformed snow, and they consistently rated ski camber as more important than non-experts did. Discussion: These findings highlight empirically developed know-how within the skiing community, such as shared heuristics for snow-type assessment and preparation, and systematic expertise-related differences in prioritising fundamental ski characteristics (e.g., camber). As such, they can be used for targeted education and to inform future applied tribology research.

Indexed as

agreement analysisexpertiseglide performanceperceptionskiingski preparationsnowtribology

Identifiers

PMID41743256
PMCPMC12929394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.