ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Perceptual consensus on cross-country ski-snow performance: a questionnaire study of experts and non-experts.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding how skiers and ski technicians perceive snow conditions and ski preparation is essential for optimising glide performance in cross-country (XC) skiing. While tribological research has established how snow microstructure, water-film formation, and ski-snow interactions influence friction, comparatively little is known about how skiers and ski technicians interpret these mechanisms in practice. Methods: We therefore conducted a nationwide questionnaire study ( Results: Agreement varied systematically across topics: the highest consensus was found for perceived ski speed on different snow types and structure selection, while the lowest was observed for glide determinants, paired glide tests involving skier mass, and double-poling positioning. Experts showed higher within-group agreement for perceived ski speed in skate-skiing and on moist transformed snow, and they consistently rated ski camber as more important than non-experts did. Discussion: These findings highlight empirically developed know-how within the skiing community, such as shared heuristics for snow-type assessment and preparation, and systematic expertise-related differences in prioritising fundamental ski characteristics (e.g., camber). As such, they can be used for targeted education and to inform future applied tribology research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.