Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41743189›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

Can atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes be properly predicted with electrocardiography and artificial intelligence?

Jasper R Vermeer, Richard A J Post, Thomas Mast, Edwin R van den Heuvel, Lukas R C Dekker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jasper R VermeerDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0713-4402
Richard A J PostDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6110-7467
Thomas MastDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3774-6276
Edwin R van den HeuvelDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-7224
Lukas R C DekkerDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8166-3716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The success of ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) varies, often leading to repeat ablation. Reliable prediction of repeat ablation remains challenging. This study aimed to investigate if AF ablation outcomes can be predicted with an electrocardiogram (ECG)-based deep learning (DL) algorithm. Methods and results: We included 865 patients undergoing AF ablation, of whom 163 (18.8%) required a repeat procedure during a minimum follow-up of 572 days. A deep neural network was trained on the raw data of the standard 12-lead ECG obtained within 3 months prior to the index ablation, using stratified nine-fold nested cross-validation. Unfortunately, the model achieved a nested cross-validation area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of only 0.61 (95% CI: 0.57-0.64). For comparison, the same analytic approach achieved significantly higher accuracy for sex classification (AUC = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.86-0.89). A random forest model only using clinical variables (age, sex, body mass index, AF pattern) yielded a similar performance for a repeat ablation (cross-validated AUC = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.55-0.63), suggesting limited added value of ECG-based prediction. SHapley Additive exPlanations was used to pinpoint the most relevant ECG segments and highlighted contributions from P-wave, QRS-complex, and T-wave features. Conclusion: The DL model demonstrated limited ability to predict repeat AF ablation based on the standard 10-second 12-lead ECG. Ablation outcomes may be influenced more by non-ECG parameters or require larger datasets or long-term ECG monitor data, and multi-modality inputs to be accurately predicted.

Indexed as

AblationAtrial fibrillationDeep learningElectrocardiogramNeural NetworksPrediction

Identifiers

PMID41743189
PMCPMC12930191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.