ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Generative Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Saliency Analysis of Eye Tracking in Cerebral/Cortical Visual Impairment (SET-CVI).
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Children with cerebral/cortical visual impairment (CVI) have neurological conditions that impact visual pathways in the brain, leading to deficits in both lower- and higher-order visual function that can be challenging to measure, especially in children with neurodevelopmental delays. We developed a method that combines eye tracking with generative artificial intelligence (AI) to characterize attention to lower- and higher-level visual characteristics in children with CVI. Design: A cross-sectional, comparative cohort study. Participants: Forty-three children with CVI and 40 typically developing pediatric controls. Methods: Participants viewed a series of still images while gaze location was recorded by an eye tracker. For each image, saliency maps highlighting 15 lower- and higher-level visual features were created by a combination of generative AI and pixel-based techniques. Participants' eye tracking fixation maps were compared to saliency maps to calculate fixation saliency values. Fixation saliency values were then compared between CVI participants and controls. The 95% prediction interval of control fixation saliency values was used to establish a normative range, and each CVI participant's fixation saliency values were categorized as normal or abnormal. The distribution of normal and abnormal fixation saliency values for each participant was termed the saliency analysis of eye tracking in CVI (SET-CVI) signature. Main Outcome Measures: Fixation saliency values in children with CVI and controls; accuracy, sensitivity, specificity; and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of SET-CVI in classifying children with CVI and controls. Results: Children with CVI had lower fixation saliency values for higher-level visual features such as human faces and bodies ( Conclusions: Eye tracking combined with generative AI can quantify attention to lower- and higher-level visual characteristics in children with CVI and distinguish affected children from controls. Saliency analysis of eye tracking in CVI signatures may be useful for guiding individualized interventions, tracking progress longitudinally, and serving as an outcome measure in future clinical trials to identify an evidence-based medical treatment for CVI. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.