ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Clinical outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy vs. microdiscectomy in lumbar disc herniation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) often causes radiculopathy, resulting in unilateral leg pain and lower back discomfort. Minimally invasive techniques such as microscopic discectomy (MSLD) and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) discectomy are widely used. However, comparative data are limited. This study compares the clinical outcomes and complications of UBE and MSLD. Methods: A single-center, retrospective, non-randomized analysis was conducted on 80 patients with LDH who underwent surgical treatment at People's Hospital of Suzhou New District between January 2021 and September 2023. Patients were categorized according to the surgical technique received into a microscope group (MG, Results: Compared with MG, the EG group was associated with shorter operation and hospitalization times and less intraoperative blood loss ( Conclusion: Both UBE and MSLD are effective surgical options for the treatment of LDH. The findings suggest that UBE may offer advantages in surgical efficiency, early pain relief, functional recovery, and intervertebral space preservation. Given the retrospective, non-randomized design, selection bias and residual confounding cannot be entirely excluded, so these associative findings require confirmation in prospective studies with longer follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.