ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Perceptions of cell-cultured "meat" embedded in the cultural context: public surveys in Japan and the United Kingdom.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The labeling of cell-cultured products for food application as "meat" remains contentious, with public perceptions varying across cultural contexts. This study examined how individuals in Japan and the United Kingdom (UK) perceive cell-cultured products, particularly whether they should be called "meat." An online survey was conducted with 1,200 respondents aged 20-59 years (600 in Japan and 600 in the UK). The questionnaire included items on agreement with calling cultured products as "meat," willingness to try cultured meat, images associated with meat, views on life, dietary patterns, and interest in environmentally friendly foods. Multiple correspondence analyzes were performed to identify clusters of opinions. Respondents interested in environmentally friendly food were more likely to support labeling cultured products as "meat" and to express willingness to try them. In Japan, those who have the relational view on life were more likely to show strong willingness to try cultured meat, whereas in the UK, vegetarian respondents were more likely to reject it. The categorical boundaries for ambiguous cell-cultured products are co-occurring with a globally expanding framework of environmental consciousness; however, attitudes are also shaped by culturally specific factors, as demonstrated in Japan and the UK. These findings underscore the importance of cultural context in guiding communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.