ArticleBiosafety and health2026
A semi-mechanistic modeling strategy for infectious diseases forecasting: Error correction and probabilistic prediction.
Article in Biosafety and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational biology and bioinformatics for infectious disease research: From molecular mechanisms to population-level surveillance.Biosafety and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global climate change and technological advancements have intensified the threats of pandemics, while complex transmission dynamics challenge infectious disease forecasting. Traditional compartmental models struggle to fully capture both the dynamic transmission processes and their associated uncertainties. Here, we develop a novel hybrid methodology that integrates dynamic modeling with statistical approaches, establishing a semi-mechanistic model for error correction and probabilistic prediction. Our error analysis of the dynamic model reveals that frequent population mobility compromises the accuracy of dynamic predictions and that meteorological conditions further modulate forecast performance by regulating human movement patterns. To capture these effects, we implement a quantile regression long short-term memory (QRLSTM) network to estimate prediction errors of the epidemic dynamic model based on mobility and environmental data. This hybrid approach corrects dynamic prediction errors and generates probabilistic forecasts. Validation using multi-state the United States (U.S.) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak data shows that our framework reduces dynamic prediction errors by over 50 %. Compared with pure deep learning approaches, the semi-mechanistic model significantly enhances long-term prediction performance and interpretability. By integrating mechanistic modeling with data-driven learning, the proposed approach improves the predictive accuracy and reliability of models in real-world outbreaks, thereby delivering more effective decision support for public health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.