ArticleBiosafety and health2026
Leveraging knowledge graphs and large language models for integrating molecular variants and clinical insights in COVID-19 research.
Article in Biosafety and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational biology and bioinformatics for infectious disease research: From molecular mechanisms to population-level surveillance.Biosafety and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relentless emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants continues to challenge global health, as high mutation rates and complex pathogenicity obscure molecular mechanisms and impede clinical progress. Despite extensive research across viral evolution, structural biology, immunology, diagnostics, and therapeutics, the resulting vast and rapidly outdated literature has widened the gap between fundamental discovery and medical application. Here, we systematically mined 439,724 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) publications using fine-tuned large language models to extract and distill knowledge across nine domains: antibodies, vaccines, serology, biochemistry, therapeutics, clinical presentation, risk factors, biomarkers, and diagnostics. These insights were integrated into a unified graph of 1,427,596 triples (CoVAR-KG). Covering 90 % of known spike-protein variant sites, our knowledge graph forges molecular-to-clinical links that reveal how specific mutations influence antigenicity, transmissibility, and treatment response. By resolving data fragmentation, this resource accelerates target identification and streamlines hypothesis generation. Building on CoVAR-KG, we developed COVID-19 variant risk watcher (CVRW), an early-warning framework that quantifies the threat of emerging variants for real-time surveillance. Coupling the graph with retrieval-augmented GPT-4o enables rapid and in-depth comparisons of variant functionality and immune escape potential. These integrative tools furnish timely insights for vaccine design, therapeutic optimization, and pandemic preparedness, establishing a versatile platform for combating current and future viral threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.