ArticleBiosafety and health2026
Impact of adjuvants on a recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike vaccine: Protective efficacy and recall antibody response following homologous challenge.
Article in Biosafety and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune imprinting, or original antigenic sin, challenges the control of evolving severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). How the quantity and quality of pre-existing immunity modulate the recall antibody response upon re-exposure remains poorly understood. We immunized hamsters with a recombinant ancestral spike protein (S-2P) formulated with one of four distinct adjuvants to assess the impact of adjuvant-induced immunity on protective efficacy. Furthermore, we analyzed the modulatory effect of the adjuvant on the potency, breadth, and evolution of antibody responses after homologous viral challenge. We found that vaccination with Montanide ISA720-adjuvanted S-2P (S-2P:ISA720) not only induced higher initial neutralizing antibody titers and conferred stronger protection but also established a pre-existing immune state capable of cross-neutralizing the antigenically distant Omicron BA.1 variant. In contrast, aluminum hydroxide adjuvanted S-2P (S-2P:Al) elicited comparatively lower neutralizing titers and showed no cross-neutralization against BA.1. Following viral challenge, the S-2P:ISA720 group exhibited significant affinity maturation toward conserved epitopes, which markedly enhanced cross-neutralization against BA.1 without increasing neutralizing titers or affinity against the homologous strain or the antigenically related Delta variant. Conversely, the S-2P:Al group mounted a narrow, imprinting-facilitated response, characterized by boosting of strain-specific antibodies without substantial improvement in BA.1 neutralization. These findings suggest that in S-2P:ISA720-immunized animals, high-affinity antibodies mediate epitope masking of immunodominant sites, thereby redirecting responses toward subdominant conserved epitopes with cross-neutralizing potential. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that adjuvants can critically guide recall immune responses toward breadth and affinity maturation, offering a rational strategy for developing next-generation vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and other variable pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.