Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742984›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Intra-procedural Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Ultrasound-Guided Microwave Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Initial Experience.

Salma Kamaledeen, Jake Cowen, Christopher Ball

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Salma KamaledeenClinical Radiology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, GBR.
Jake CowenClinical Radiology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, GBR.
Christopher BallClinical Radiology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound-guided microwave ablation is an alternative to the more widespread computed tomography (CT)-guided ablation. It confers some advantages such as immediate probe position adjustments, observation of real-time effects of ablation, lower radiation dose, and reduction in procedure time without increasing demand on diagnostic CT scanners. However, opponents of this technique cite the difficulty of visualising the thermal probe position or ablation zone. Incorporating cone-beam CT (CBCT) during ultrasound-guided tumour ablation allows improved visualisation and accuracy of thermal probe placement, but little data is available on this combined approach. We describe our centre's experience of the use of intra-procedural CBCT to aid the accuracy of ultrasound-guided microwave tumour ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the liver. Our results demonstrate that employing intra-procedural CBCT during ultrasound-guided ablation of HCC liver tumours can be a safe and effective minimally invasive technique.

Indexed as

cone-beam computed tomography (cbct)hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc)interventional oncologypercutaneous microwave ablationultrasound-guided

Identifiers

PMID41742984
PMCPMC12931666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.