Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742937›Full record

ArticleAtmosphere2025

Revisiting the Convective Like Boundary Layer Assumption in the Urban Option of AERMOD.

Jonathan Retter, Robert Christopher Owen, Annamarie Leske, Michelle Snyder, Rhett Sargent, David Heist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atmosphere, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan RetterOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Research, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6812-163X
Robert Christopher OwenU.S. EPA Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Annamarie LeskeJohns Hopkins Applied Physics Labs, Laurel, MD 20723, USA.
Michelle SnyderWSP Global Inc., Durham, NC 27703, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4225-1556
Rhett SargentDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
David HeistU.S. EPA Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban areas and their surroundings feature unique, horizontally inhomogeneous spatial distributions of land use and land cover, leading to urban heat islands (UHIs) for both air and land surface temperature that complicate the estimation of urban sensible heat flux. The urban dispersion option in AERMOD, the American Meteorological Society (AMS)/Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regulatory Model, incorporates this effect at night through a "convective like boundary layer" that modifies the single column meteorology based on a population number representative of the urban area. The model produces positive nighttime sensible heat flux values that often significantly overestimate observed values from the literature. This study re-examines the formulation of the AERMOD urban option assumptions, methodology, and original evaluation against a field study of a power plant in Indianapolis. We investigate replacing the population-based parameterizations of urban-surrounding temperature differences (

Indexed as

dispersion modelingremote sensingurban heat islandsurban sensible heat flux

Identifiers

PMID41742937
PMCPMC12931099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.