ArticleEnvironmental research, health : ERH2026
Data needs for accelerating research at the intersection of climate stressors and health: an online survey.
Article in Environmental research, health : ERH, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data Considerations for Estimating Ambient Heat Exposure for Environmental Epidemiological Studies.Current environmental health reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing the health impacts of climate stressors is challenging due to the inherently interdisciplinary nature of the effort and the complexity of data, methods, and software involved. We surveyed researchers who published in the climate and health space to identify major barriers to using and sharing climate and health data and code resources. Participants were identified using a PubMed query to return articles related to research in the field of climate and health. Using the PubMed API, we scraped email addresses for authors of matching published articles. 9195 authors were emailed a link to the online survey instrument, which took approximately 7 min to complete. We had an 11.8% response rate resulting in 1041 useable responses. Respondents were from over 75 different countries with only 16.4% working with US populations and were evenly represented between early, mid, and established career. The most desired resources were analysis-ready datasets and educational materials on data management and analysis. Personal constraints such as lack of time were a major barrier to sharing data or code. Our survey results suggest that investment in data creation as a professional service, knowledge sharing and collaboration, and research infrastructure will be enthusiastically adopted and help to accelerate the pace of research to practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.