Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742923›Full record

ArticleMissouri medicine

Advancing Decision Support Systems with Data, Informatics, and Learning Health Systems in a Post-Meaningful Use Era.

Adam Wilcox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Adam WilcoxProfessor in the Institute for Informatics, Data Science and Biostatistics and Department of Medicine at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The HITECH Act and Meaningful Use (MU) successfully drove widespread EHR adoption but largely missed the strategic goal of healthcare transformation. While EHRs are now ubiquitous, few institutions have transitioned to a true Learning Health System (LHS). To support achieving transformative impact, this article proposes an extension of a previously-described quality improvement life cycle model, aligning it with modern informatics and artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. We detail how the stages of DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) provide the necessary structured framework for advancing decision support within a post-MU environment. We argue that by integrating AI-driven tools into each step of the DMAIC cycle, healthcare organizations can effectively leverage their vast stores of electronic clinical data. This structured approach offers a pathway to establishing agile, data-driven learning health systems necessary to fulfill the latent promise of health information technology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceelectronic health recordslearning health systemMeaningful usequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID41742923
PMCPMC12931598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.