ArticleMissouri medicine
Cochlear Implants: An Overview.
Article in Missouri medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Hearing loss poses a significant health burden to the Missouri population and broader United States (US). Cochlear implantation is the most effective intervention for patients with sensorineural hearing loss who do not find adequate benefit from hearing aids. Objective: This review provides an overview on cochlear implantation including its history, mechanisms, candidacy criteria, outcomes, and continued challenges in access and utilization. Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed to identify peer-reviewed articles using relevant keywords pertaining to cochlear implantation. Findings: Cochlear implantation has evolved significantly over the past six decades, and advancements continue to be made. Extensive research has supported cochlear implantation as a highly effective intervention in both adults and children, and its indications and candidacy criteria continue to expand. However, cochlear implantation is underutilized, driven by a combination of socioeconomic, individual, and health systems related factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41742917PMC12931596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.