ArticleCancer science2026
Clinical and Genetic Landscape of Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype With FGFR Gene Family Alterations.
Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype (GBM, IDH-wt), is a highly aggressive brain tumor with a poor prognosis. Alterations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene family-such as FGFR::TACC fusions and FGFR1 mutations-have emerged as potential therapeutic targets; however, their clinical and genetic features in GBM, IDH-wt remain unclear. We analyzed 1076 GBM, IDH-wt cases using comprehensive genomic profiling data from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database in Japan. FGFR alterations were detected in 8.0% of patients, including FGFR::TACC fusions (3.3%) and FGFR1 mutations (2.9%). The FGFR::TACC fusion-positive group was older at diagnosis and showed higher frequencies of TERT promoter mutation and MDM2 amplification, and lower frequencies of EGFR amplification and TP53 mutation, compared with the fusion-negative group. The FGFR1 mutation-positive group was enriched for ATRX, NF1, and PIK3CA mutations and had significantly fewer TERT promoter and PTEN mutations, compared with the mutation-negative group. No significant differences in overall survival were observed, although both groups tended to have longer median overall survival compared with their respective negative groups. This study represents the largest genomic cohort to date of FGFR alterations in GBM, IDH-wt. FGFR::TACC fusion-positive and FGFR1 mutation-positive GBMs exhibited distinct genetic profiles, highlighting the clinical relevance of molecular subclassification and providing insight for future therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.