Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41742668›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2026

Livestock Integration Into Cropping Systems Enhances Their Climate Change Resistance and Mitigation While Reducing Their Environmental Impacts.

Mathieu Delandmeter, Bruno Basso, Xavier Fettweis, Christophe Lacroix, Pierre Aubry, Jérôme Bindelle, Benjamin Dumont

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mathieu DelandmeterGembloux Agro-Bio Tech, TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, Plant Sciences/Crop Science, Liege University, Gembloux, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5184-851X
Bruno BassoDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2090-4616
Xavier FettweisSPHERES Research Unit, Department of Geography, Liege University, Liège, Belgium.
Christophe LacroixGembloux Agro-Bio Tech, TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, Plant Sciences/Crop Science, Liege University, Gembloux, Belgium.
Pierre AubryGembloux Agro-Bio Tech, TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, Plant Sciences/Crop Science, Liege University, Gembloux, Belgium.
Jérôme BindelleGembloux Agro-Bio Tech, TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, Animal Sciences, Liege University, Gembloux, Belgium.
Benjamin DumontGembloux Agro-Bio Tech, TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, Plant Sciences/Crop Science, Liege University, Gembloux, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS 44221Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS 549 R.8003.20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sustainability of cropping systems is linked to their circularity, which is their ability to close resource cycles such as carbon and nitrogen through strategies for managing crop residues, byproducts, and other inputs. Here, we investigate three crop rotations-business-as-usual (BAU), vegan, and integrated crop-livestock systems (ICLS)-varying in livestock integration, crop residue fate, and human diet sustained. Under ten climate change scenarios, we compare their impacts on multiple ecosystem services during 24 years over 541,800 ha in Belgium using a validated crop model. All three circularity scenarios are found to be net greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters, with increasing intensity under climate change. The BAU system, favoring cash crops such as sugarbeet or potato, demonstrates the highest productivity, which, however, is highly variable across years and comes with greater environmental impacts such as GHG emissions (+45% and +23% compared to ICLS and Vegan in average-i.e., across all sites and climate scenarios). The Vegan system has lower carbon sequestration than the ICLS due to the lack of pasture and livestock, which, however, is partly offset by the regular incorporation of crop residues into the soil. Finally, ICLS, which include temporary pastures and sheep, demonstrate intermediate productivity levels compared to the other systems. However, they offer the greatest stability and resistance to extreme weather (+43% and +86% for stability compared to BAU and Vegan, in average), with better environmental performance. Therefore, our study reveals the benefits of crop-livestock systems in terms of climate change adaptation, through stability and resistance to extreme climate events, and mitigation, through soil carbon sequestration and reduced greenhouse gas emissions and nitrate leaching. Moreover, our findings highlight the critical links between farm-level circularity, soil-crop feedbacks, human diet, and climate change.

Indexed as

AgricultureClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesLivestockAnimalsBelgiumCrops, AgriculturalEnvironmentGreenhouse GasesGreenhouse Gasescircularityclimate changecrop‐livestockcrop modelecosystem servicesgreenhouse gashuman dietleachingresistanceSTICS

Identifiers

PMID41742668
PMCPMC12936454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.