ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2026
Evaluation of 600 mg/m2 cytarabine arabinoside as treatment for meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown origin in 43 dogs.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCytarabine arabinoside (CA) is commonly used at 200 mg/m2 to treat dogs with meningoencephalomyelitis of unknown origin (MUO); use of higher doses is anecdotally reported. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesTo describe the clinical outcome in 43 dogs with MUO receiving 600 mg/m2 CA. We hypothesized that high dose CA would be well tolerated, that the majority of dogs with MUO would achieve sustained remission, and that dogs with spinal cord-only MUO or presumptive necrotizing meningoencephalitis (NME) would carry a more guarded prognosis. ANIMALS: Forty-three client-owned dogs with MUO.
methodsRetrospective observational study. Medical records were reviewed at a private practice over a 2.5-year period to identify dogs with MUO with clinical signs <14 days and neurological examination and MRI abnormalities suggestive of moderate to severe disease (mild cases excluded). All dogs received 600 mg/m2 CA every 3-6 weeks for a minimum of 6 months or until death. Minimum follow up time was 24 months.
resultsTwenty-three out of twenty-five (92%) dogs without spinal cord MUO, presumptive NME, or death from other diseases survived >24 months (median 1027 days, range 770-1277 days). Thirteen out of forty-three (30%) dogs were euthanized due to poor disease control (median 17 days, range 1-340 days), including 5/10 (50%) dogs with spinal cord only MUO and 5/5 (100%) dogs with presumptive NME. No serious adverse events were noted with 600 mg/m2 CA. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Six hundred mg/m2 CA was well tolerated and effectively controlled disease in most dogs with MUO. Response rate was lower for dogs with spinal cord MUO or presumptive NME.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.