ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2026
Radiation therapy as a treatment for urinary obstruction secondary to urothelial carcinoma in dogs.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUrothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common urinary bladder tumor in dogs, often invading and involving the bladder wall, trigone, urethra, and prostate and can lead to obstruction of urine outflow at the level of the ureters or urethra. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesTo describe the outcome of dogs with UC presenting with urethral or ureteral obstruction treated with radiation therapy (RT). ANIMALS: Twenty-five client-owned dogs treated with RT.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted. Overall survival, time to first event, and restoration of patency were evaluated by obstruction location and radiotherapy protocol.
resultsOverall obstruction relief was achieved in 15/25 (60%) dogs. Definitive intent protocols showed significantly longer time to obstruction relief (median 8 vs 4 days; range 2-10 vs 2-7 days; P = .02), however, had higher overall efficacy (83% vs 53%) and survival times compared to palliative intent protocols (P = .01). Dogs that had relief of obstruction regardless of RT intent received a significantly higher total dose compared to those that did not experience relief (median 36 Gy vs 8 Gy; range 12-57 vs 6-24 Gy; P < .001). Median overall survival time was 134 days (range 6-969 days) and time to first event was 107 days (range 4-695 days). Location of obstruction did not significantly improve survival or time to obstruction relief. Relief was temporary for 27% of unobstructed dogs, and re-obstruction was seen at a median of 14 days (range 5-33 days). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Radiation therapy is a viable treatment option for relieving urinary obstruction secondary to UC. Radiation therapy protocol should be determined based on the dog's clinical signs, ability to medically manage obstruction, and therapeutic goals of the owner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.