ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2026
Pharmacokinetic analysis and steady-state predictions of different preparations of metronidazole administered per rectum in adult horses.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManipulation of forms of rectally administered metronidazole to improve bioavailability in horses has not been reported. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesEvaluate the pharmacokinetics of 3 rectal metronidazole preparations compared to nasogastric (NG) administration. ANIMALS: Seven healthy horses.
methodsPhase 1A was a randomized, 3-way crossover, single-dose pharmacokinetic study, and Phases 1B and 2 were non-randomized, single-dose follow-up studies. Metronidazole (20 mg/kg) was administered NG and rectally in water (RW20), as a rectal gel (RG), and in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Metronidazole (80 mg/kg) was also administered rectally in water (RW80) to 3 horses. Plasma concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic variables were calculated, and predicted steady-state area under the curve (AUC0-24,ss) to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio was used as a pharmacodynamic target.
resultsBioavailabilities for RW20 (33.7%), RG (2.49%), and DMSO (12.0%) were low relative to NG administration. When administered at a dosage of 20 mg/kg, only NG every 8 h was predicted to achieve the pharmacodynamic target in all horses. Administered rectally in water, the metronidazole maximum concentration increased from 3.11 +/- 0.63 μg/mL to 4.19 +/- 1.04 μg/mL when the dose was increased to 80 mg/kg. The RW80 predicted AUC0-24,ss for every 8 h administration was above target for all 3 horses. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: With the tested preparations, rectal administration of metronidazole at a standard dosage of 20 mg/kg yielded subtherapeutic plasma concentrations. Administering a 4-fold higher dose rectally in water might overcome these limitations. Oral and intravenous routes remain the preferred methods for administering metronidazole in horses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.